Your team uses AI. Has the way your company works actually changed?
Individual usage is a starting point. Operational change needs a workflow, an owner, and a before-and-after comparison.
Understand it.
Put it to work.
For the people who run the business.
And the people making AI work inside it.
Clear explanations. Practical exercises.
No new vocabulary required.
Your assistant.
Your company’s
intelligence.
They are not the same thing. Start with the distinction that changes how you build.
Personal agents vs. company agentsPersonal context
My notesMy tasksMy tools
Useful to one person.
Company context
Reusable. Owned. Permissioned.
Learn the parts.
Then choose the job.
Three short, written lessons on how an AI employee works. Read in order, or start with the question you have.
Explore the Academy- 01
Brain, desk, keys.
Understand the three parts of an AI employee—and what to ask about each one.
- 02
The manager’s job.
Give the system a defined task, a review boundary, and a result you can measure.
- 03
From personal assistant to company employee.
What changes when more than one person relies on the system.
Free to read. No signup required.
A closer look.
All insights2 min read
What belongs in a company brain—and what doesn’t?
A research note on useful context, maintained sources, and the difference between remembering and knowing.
Read, draft, act: deciding what AI can do without asking.
A practical way to discuss permissions before a useful assistant becomes an unpredictable operator.
What Uber’s Genie teaches us about a company brain.
Less waiting for answers. Fewer repeated questions. A practical lesson in making company knowledge useful.
Same models. Different depth of adoption.
An operator’s reading of OpenAI’s Enterprise Signals: the usage gap, the skills gap, and the work behind both.
The usage gap widened
Frontier / typical output tokens per active user · multiple
Jan 20262.6×
Jun 20268.3×
The environment changes what people delegate.
What Anthropic’s Cadences report suggests about tools, delegation and learning—and what it cannot prove.
The delegation gap survives a same-model comparison
Claude Code minus chat / Cowork · points on a 1–5 autonomy scale
Overall0.37 pts
Sonnet only0.26 pts